a word from our sponsors
See the new shakespeare.com. This feature, while it still provides useful information, is no longer maintained.
Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help
I guess I'll have to get the book to see how he draws that conclusion. My main interest is history, not literature, and I became interested in this because of the authorship controversy. I've concluded the Oxfordian theory is silly but now I want to know more about the real Shakespeare.
Hamilton, I've learned, has done numerous works on manuscripts and signatures, so at least he has some credentials.
The apocrypha also interest me: why some of these works at times attributed to Shakespeare aren't accepted as such. Or which plays might have been collaborations or revisions. The Two Noble Kinsmen is included in a complete works that I have, but I notice it usually isn't listed in the canon. I've looked around for books that focus on these issues but haven't found any, except Hamilton's which you were kind enough to point out to me. Do you know of any others?Posted by Merrill McCarty on April 15, 1997 at 16:55:46
In Reply to "See the guy on the right? That's Shake's self-portrait!!" posted by Gabriel Z. Wasserman on April 15, 1997 at 14:52:11
Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help