a word from our sponsors

See the new shakespeare.com. This feature, while it still provides useful information, is no longer maintained.


Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help


I'm arguing neither for nor against your proposition . . .

. . . I'm just saying all the discussion above and below is tiresome because it's not getting anywhere, and, for the present anyway, can't get anywhere. I tend to side with you that the sonnets are personal and at least partially autobiographical (but I'm willing to be proven wrong) -- but even in that case, there are possible heterosexual interpretations (father-to-son, father-to-surrogate-son), so we're still left with ambiguity. That's all I meant by "unprovable."
Anyway, based on the engraving on the frontipiece of the First Folio, I'm inclined to think that Shakespeare was really an alien, badly made up to resemble a human being. ("ET, summon thee to home . . .")
cheers

Posted by JTJ on April 10, 1997 at 06:27:17
In Reply to "evidence" posted by Professor Mike on April 10, 1997 at 02:51:09


 Replies


 Post a Reply

Name
E-mail
Reply in brief

Reply at length
 
 
(Note: line breaks
 will be preserved)

   
Optional Section (if desired, please fill out before submitting your reply)
Site URL
Site Name
Image URL

Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help