See the new shakespeare.com. This feature, while it still provides useful information, is no longer maintained.

Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help

I saw it. Quite amusing.

I suggest you go to a dictionary and look up the word "evidence." You merely took the words and gave them your own personal prejudiced interpretation. No where did you show that that was the only interpretation (and there are countless others, all equally as easy to support as yours), or that yours had any basis in fact.

Let's see some FACTS to support your case.

Posted by Reality Chuck on April 14, 1997 at 06:52:16
In Reply to "See "A Close Reading of Sonnet 121," please" posted by Professor Mike on April 12, 1997 at 03:36:20

 Replies

• Childish Abuse, Chuck. Professor Mike 01:47:57 4/15/97 (5)
  • I don't play word games. Reality Chuck 05:34:11 4/15/97 (4)
    • No, you CAN'T interpret any way you like... Professor Mike 13:44:29 4/15/97 (3)
      • Shakey interpretation hotspurs boots 06:48:59 5/22/97 (0)
      • But you HAVE interpreted it just the way you want. Reality Chuck 06:08:06 4/16/97 (0)
      • Using your standards, it is. Reality Chuck 06:07:22 4/16/97 (0)

 Post a Reply

Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help