a word from our sponsors

See the new shakespeare.com. This feature, while it still provides useful information, is no longer maintained.


Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help


more poppycock

Well you certainly don't pull your punches.

S might not have created boy actors but he certainly
exploited the sexual ambiguities.

You miss the strong probability that the sonnets were
autobiographical. Before you say it, I know it can't be
documented, but then almost everything claimed for S
can't be documented including, eg., his exact birth date
and whether he attended school. The internal evidence of the
sonnets reveals their autobiographical nature.

The Shakespearian dialectic is far more than irony. It's
a style..."where civil blood makes civil hands unclean."

Try to bring some respect to the discussion. We can diagree
without either of us spouting poppycock.

Posted by Professor Mike on April 10, 1997 at 02:45:39
In Reply to "Poppycock" posted by Bruce Spielbauer on April 09, 1997 at 15:38:23


 Replies


 Post a Reply

Name
E-mail
Reply in brief

Reply at length
 
 
(Note: line breaks
 will be preserved)

   
Optional Section (if desired, please fill out before submitting your reply)
Site URL
Site Name
Image URL

Replies | Post Reply | Shakespeare Queries & Replies From Everyone Else 4.2.97: Top | Help